Quick Answer: No - and that's what makes living the
Christian life such a challenge!
Key Passage:
Rom 7:18 "...in
my <sarx> dwelleth no good thing." If you believe, as I do, that Romans 7 is
describing the Christian experience from the perspective of someone who is a Christian,
then this passage is clear: the flesh
does not change at conversion. It cannot change. It is material. Note that the "body" (i.e.
<soma>) is not the same as "flesh" (<sarx>) - (see discussion here). To be very specific on
this point: the molecules in the brain
(or elsewhere in the body) are not
changed at the point of conversion.
Conversion changes our whole "us", and changes our destiny,
but we are much more than flesh. The
flesh is certainly impacted by our conversion because the flesh is impacted by
our <psuche-pneuma>.
I Pet 2:11 "...abstain from sinful <sarkikos> desires,
which wage war against your soul <psuche>." Our flesh just pursues self-preservation and
pleasure. It is inherently selfish. To live the Christian life, we must be
selfless. Thus it is a full out war.
Caveat:
I Cor 6:13-20
Even if the flesh does not change, this does not mean that Christians
can just ignore the flesh and say "oh well - that's just the flesh doing
it." We are responsible for our flesh and our flesh is part of us as long as
we are alive as material human beings.
We cannot escape that. Though
Jesus taught us to see that the spiritual was of prime importance, He did not
ignore the flesh or ever say it was of no account. He just kept the flesh and the physical world
in its rightful place. This is why the
practice of spiritual disciplines is useful.
These disciplines build habits into our flesh that allow us to live the
Christian life easier.
Related Scriptures
and Thoughts:
Phil 3:3 "...we
worship God in the <pneuma>…no confidence in the <sarx>." There is no confidence that the <sarx>
can serve God.
I Thes 5:23 "I pray
God your whole <pneuma> and <psuche> and <soma> be preserved
blameless unto the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ." Paul does not use <sarx> here, and if
<soma> means "container of you" (see here), then this verse
makes sense.
Ro 2:29 "No, a man is a Jew if he is one inwardly; and
circumcision is circumcision of the heart, by the Spirit, not by the written
code. Such a man's praise is not from men, but from God." This seems pretty clear that salvation
affects the <psuche-pneuma> - the inward man. The law is outward. It has to do with the things the flesh
does. And if our flesh could keep the
law, then we would have been justified through it. But it does
not and it cannot. Only death releases us from the flesh - that
is the only way to get rid of the body of death.
Discussion:
From a
scientific perspective, the point is this:
if you could have a measure of the status of all the molecules of the
body of someone as they become a believer in Jesus Christ, you would not
necessarily detect some instantaneous difference. However, the mind is transformed - our
perspective on everything is different - and thus the patterns of thinking in
the mind are transformed. There might be
a difference in the pattern of neural firing in the brain of a Christian, but that
is an effect that generally takes some time.
The
composition of the Christian brain or the Christian flesh is the same as the
composition of the brain and flesh of any other person. If we could measure the status of the
<psuche-pneuma>, the story would be different and we would expect to see
changes at, and beyond, conversion.
Further, we expect that changes in the <psuche-pneuma> should
"work their way out" in our flesh and become evident over time. Christians should live a transformed
life. Christians should not be using the
flesh as an excuse for bad behavior. Sin
is still sin. When Christians sin, it is
a stain to the reputation of Christ and it should not happen.
I can
imagine that, at some point in the future, scientists might discover neurons,
or subcomponents of neurons, that appear to be influenced by some outside
force. But science will not consider this to be evidence of the soul because the soul is not material. Instead, I think the hypothesis will be that
the influence is due to something material, like electromagnetic waves. This whole concept is explored in a lot more detail in my series on "Theory of the soul."
My goal in
this series of entries on the "Body, Soul, and Spirit" is to help
Christians see where their beliefs begin and end, and where science begins and
ends with respect to this topic. In this
case, the two areas do not mesh.
Christian belief rests heavily on the concept of a soul-spirit in every
human being. Conversion happens in the
soul-spirit. Science can only look and
observe the material world, and thus will always only see the flesh. The tools of science are not designed to
detect anything non-material (i.e. spiritual).
If science ever claims that there is no soul, it is clearly out of
bounds.
No comments:
Post a Comment